Lemanskills.com

PCM: Communication Channels

When I was describing all 6 Process Communication Model (PCM) types, it dawned on me that if I want to find one aspect of it that interests me, I need to go into each article and look for one part. And there are some of those, that are more important to dig deeper into, a good example is the aspect of communication channel.

So I’ve decided that I’ll go into this directing to simplify and edit this experience for you: to go into some aspects of PCM, with practical examples. Hope that’ll be useful and will give you all the impulse to start using it in real life.

 

What Are Communication Channels?

 

Before we go into the details, let’s start with answering this questions: what a channel actually is?

Communication channel is the way we build a sentence we want to push forward the other person (doesn’t matter if it’s a written or verbal communication). Surprisingly it really does matter if we put a question mark or a period at the end of the sentence. It matters so much that most of the time it has a huge influence on if the communication will go through or not (will be efficient or will lead to a misunderstanding).

What do I mean by that? Take a look on those examples (purposefully not business-related):

  • What do you think about this painting?
  • Please tell me what you think about this painting.
  • Oh man, what a painting, I’m sure it kills us both just from looking at it!!!!!
  • Thank you for being here with me to marvel this painting, I’m more than happy to hear your impressions on it.

Do you see the difference? We all have one dominant preference of getting and using the channel, depends on our personality base. When you look on those sentences: which one is the most comfortable for you? Depending on which one you choose, it’s a strong indicator of your base.

 

Requestive Channel

 

The first sentence is a great example of a requestive channel. As you can see, the idea is simple: ask a question (so a sentence with a question mark at the end of it).

Using the knowledge that you already have, you can see the difference between the questions that we can ask towards 2 bases that will prefer this channel: Thinker and Persister. Channel is only one part of the puzzle: if we want communication to go through with success we need to combine a preferred channel with a favorite perception. That’s why we’ll ask different question within a conversation with a Thinker and Persister. We’ll ask:

Thinker: “What do you think…?”

Persister “What is your opinion on…? / What do you believe…?”

It is important to ask the right questions. And as much important is to know which channels are not so good to use in communication with certain types. Thinker and Persister will react really badly on others, but the worst thing you can do is to use directive channel. It will trigger them to go straight into distress, reactive aggressively form their attacker mask.

 

Directive Channel

 

Directive channel is about creating the sentence with the dot at the end of it.

I would love for all of us to demystify being direct and separate it from being aggressive, rude or too pushy.

Being directive is just saying what there’s to be done: I’m not asking you or hesitate. I just say it in a straightforward way, taking care of OK-OK perspective.

Two PCM types prefer to get it: Promoter and Imaginer. And again, it will differ on how we build a communication to each of them. That’s because their need of getting directive channel is different: Promoter doesn’t want to waste time, so they just want to get a task and move to action. Imaginer wants to be invited to share what’s in their heads, so they need direct communication to do that. So, the way we is this channel matters. We’ll say:

Promoter: “Please create this report for tomorrow, not later than 5PM.”

Imaginer: “I need this report to be done by tomorrow, not later than 5PM. Please tell me what you see in your head when I ask you to do it.” 

Both are tasks we want to delegate for a person but said differently.

They are not very good at receiving requestive channel, also Imaginer will react with a drooper mask on Emotive one (too much emotion for them).

 

 Emotive Channel

 

Emotive channel is about the positive energy and contact. As we can easily guess, the Rebel is our person here: it’s their favorite channel. In this one they can exchange energy, creative ideas, brainstorm and get into positive contact with others. It works even if it’s just for a little bit at the beginning of the conversation.

How can it look like?

“OH MAAAAN, this weekend was so dope, I need to tell you about it!”
“C’mon, let’s do it and then we’ll go into the agenda: it won’t kill us to talk a little bit!”

It is about 2-3 exchanges and then you can go to the point of the meeting or a conversation. Sometimes it’s just about the exchange and that’s enough: especially when you are a Rebel in a base yourself, you’ll enjoy the conversation itself if it’s led that way.

 

Nurturative Channel

 

Last but not least: Harmonizer and their preferred nurturative channel.

Nurturative channel is all about seeing a person, feeding their recognition of person need. Harmonizers needs to be seen, as an important part of a team, community or other relationship.

Sometimes it’s enough to say:

“Thank you for being here. I know that recently it’s been crazy busy and hard, so I really appreciate you finding time to talk.”

 The key thing here is to give a positive, nurturing recognition of a person, making them visible and important. In the world of endless task lists, constant rush and not enough time for anything, we could all use more moments like this for a proper recognition and a gratitude that will give us more conscience that we can’t take everything and everyone we have in our work or life for granted.

 

The Bottom Line

 

This is simple, but not always easy: use the channel that your recipient prefers, not what is your preferred way to receive communication from others. It’s not a problem when on the other side of communication process is the person who prefers the same channel as we do: then we don’t need to stretch at all. The situation gets more complicated when we need to reach to our condo on the higher levels of skills: we can do it, since we all have all resources in us.

Being mindful about our own preferences and how much does it cost to reach to each of the others is the first step to train the muscle of using the right channel. I believe it’s worth it, when we think about all those hours that we waste on clarifying communication and resolving misunderstandings.

What do you say: is it worth it for you too?

 

PS. Here’s a great podcast around communication itself (not PCM-related, but also really insightful):

 

Udostępnij

Komentarze

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 komentarzy
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Czytaj także

Organization

Job-Hugging: When Staying Put Becomes a Strategy (Or a Trap)

Remember 2021? When did it feel like everyone and their neighbor was quitting their job? The Great Resignation dominated headlines—millions of people walking away from their roles every single month. Media outlets couldn’t stop talking about it. Fast forward to today, and the pendulum has swung hard in the opposite direction. Welcome to the era of job-hugging. What the Numbers Are Telling Us? According to Monster’s 2025 Job Hugging Report, the landscape has completely shifted. Here’s what’s happening: 48% of workers admit they’re staying in their current roles longer than they otherwise would—driven by comfort, security, and stability 75% plan to remain in their current position for at least the next two years 85% say they’ve practiced job-hugging at some point in their career Voluntary departures have dropped from 4.5 million monthly (November 2021 peak) to around 3.2-3.3 million today The trend isn’t slowing down. 59% of workers say job-hugging is more common in 2025 than it was last year, and 63% expect it to grow even stronger in 2026. The top reasons people are staying put? Compensation and benefits (27%) and job security (26%). This isn’t just data. This is a fundamental shift in how people think about their careers. When Job-Hugging Makes Sense? Let me be clear about something: job-hugging isn’t inherently good or bad. It’s a tool. And like any tool, context matters. Sometimes staying is the smartest decision you can make. Maybe you have a mortgage. Maybe your partner just switched jobs, and you need the stability. Maybe you’re dealing with health issues—yours or a family member’s. Maybe you’re simply exhausted from the mental load of the past few years and don’t have the bandwidth for a job search right now. All of these are valid reasons. Job searching is work. It’s additional, unpaid work on top of your already full plate. Not everyone has the energy for that, and that’s okay. But here’s where it gets interesting: job-hugging can actually work in your favor if you’re intentional about it. Staying in your current role makes sense when you’re: Taking on new projects that stretch your capabilities Learning from people outside your immediate team Building deep expertise that compounds over time Developing relationships that open doors internally Getting exposure to different parts of the business The keyword here? Intentional. Because staying by default and staying by design are two completely different strategies. The Trap Nobody Talks About Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many teams right now are full of people who’ve mentally checked out but physically stayed. That’s not stability. That’s inertia masquerading as strategy. The Monster report revealed some telling emotional trade-offs: 38% say job-hugging has no real impact on their satisfaction 27% feel less satisfied and “stuck” in their roles 25% feel more satisfied, citing security and value When it comes to career growth, workers are similarly divided: 47% say it has little effect 27% see it as limiting advancement 26% believe it builds expertise And here’s what concerns me most: 94% of workers recognize there are risks to job-hugging. The top concerns? Missing out on higher pay (26%), burnout from lack of change (25%), and limited career advancement (25%). So people know. They know they’re potentially trading long-term growth for short-term comfort. But they’re doing it anyway. The Real Question Leaders Should Be Asking If 75% of your team plans to stay through 2027, what are you doing to ensure they’re growing, not just showing up? This is where most organizations are failing spectacularly. See, employers love job huggers. The same Monster report shows that companies value them for loyalty (26%), institutional knowledge (22%), and lower turnover costs (30%). But here’s the problem: just because someone is staying doesn’t mean they’re engaged. It doesn’t mean they’re motivated. And it definitely doesn’t mean they’re performing at their best. In my work with tech leaders through the CQ Leadership Method, I see this pattern constantly: Teams filled with talented people who are… fine. Not thriving. Not building. Not pushing boundaries. Just… there. They show up to meetings. They complete their tasks. They don’t rock the boat. But they’re not bringing the energy, creativity, or commitment that actually moves organizations forward. And leaders? They’re often relieved people aren’t quitting, so they don’t dig deeper. What Communication Intelligence Reveals About Job-Hugging? When I work with teams using Process Communication Model® (PCM), one of the first things we uncover is how people’s motivational needs are—or aren’t—being met. People don’t just stay in jobs for money and benefits, despite what they tell surveys. They stay (or leave) based on whether their core psychological needs are being fulfilled. For some people, job-hugging might feel safe because their need for structure and recognition is being met. For others, it’s a quiet desperation—they need challenge, growth, and autonomy, but fear has them frozen in place. The difference between strategic job-hugging and career stagnation often comes down to this: Are you having real conversations about what people actually need to grow? Not surface-level check-ins. Not performance reviews that feel like box-ticking exercises. Real conversations. The kind where you ask: “What do you want to learn this year that you don’t know how to do right now?” “What projects would energize you?” “What’s one thing that, if we could change it, would make you more excited to be here?” These conversations require Communication Intelligence (CQ)—the ability to recognize that different people are motivated by different things, and to tailor your leadership approach accordingly. What Actually Works: Moving From Job-Hugging to Strategic Growth If you’re a leader right now, here’s what I’d encourage you to do: Acknowledge the reality Don’t pretend the economic uncertainty isn’t real. Don’t downplay people’s legitimate concerns about stability. Meet them where they are. Create visible growth paths If people are going to stay for two years, show them what growth looks like internally. Not vague “development opportunities”—specific projects, skills, and experiences they can pursue. Make development a performance metric Track it. Talk about it in 1:1s. Make it as important

Czytaj dalej
Leadership

The Number One Struggle of New Tech Leaders (And How to Navigate It)

You’ve just been promoted. The title changed from Senior Developer to Engineering Manager, from Tech Lead to Director of Technology. Congratulations—you’ve worked hard for this moment.   But then reality hits. Your inbox explodes. Slack messages pile up faster than you can read them. You’re pulled into meeting after meeting. Your calendar looks like a game of Tetris gone wrong. And that code you used to write? That deep work you loved? It’s now squeezed into whatever gaps remain between 1:1s, stand-ups, stakeholder updates, and strategic planning sessions. Welcome to the number one struggle every brand-new leader in technology faces: Communication overload. The Hidden Cost of Being “Always On” Here’s what nobody tells you when you step into leadership: Your job has fundamentally transformed from creating solutions to constant communication. And the data confirms this shift is real—and overwhelming. According to Grammarly’s 2024 State of Business Communication Report, developed with The Harris Poll, knowledge workers now spend 88% of their workweek communicating. For new tech leaders juggling team management, cross-functional collaboration, and strategic initiatives, that percentage often exceeds 100% of a standard work week. The report reveals something even more alarming: in the past 12 months, 78% of professionals saw increases in communication frequency, while 73% are using more communication channels than ever before. For HR teams and large organizations—exactly where many new tech leaders find themselves—many report spending over 40 hours weekly on communication alone. Think about that for a moment. Communication isn’t just part of the job anymore. Communication is the job. Why New Tech Leaders Feel it Most Intensely? As someone who works with hundreds of tech leaders each year through workshops and one-on-one mentoring, I see this pattern repeatedly. New leaders get caught in what I call the “triple communication trap”: You haven’t let go of your Individual Contributor identity. You were promoted because you were exceptional at solving technical problems. Your brain is wired to think in code, systems, and architecture. But now, your value comes from enabling others to do that work. This identity shift is brutal, and most new leaders try to do both—leading AND coding—which doubles their communication load while halving their effectiveness at each. You lack Communication Intelligence (CQ). We invest heavily in developing technical skills—learning new frameworks, mastering cloud architectures, and understanding AI/ML pipelines. But communication? We assume it’s intuitive. It’s not. Just as you wouldn’t expect someone to write production-ready code without training, you can’t expect leaders to navigate complex human dynamics without developing their Communication Intelligence. As I explored in the article on Communication Debt, many organizations suffer from a severe lack of investment in communication processes. New leaders inherit this debt without realizing it, then struggle to understand why their teams seem disengaged or why projects constantly fail due to “miscommunication.” You’re drowning in channels without a strategy. Email. Slack. Teams. Zoom. Jira. Confluence. GitHub comments. The average tech leader toggles between 8-10 communication platforms daily. Research shows that 55% of professionals say the constant flow of notifications across channels makes it hard to concentrate on important tasks, and 47% feel unsure about selecting the right channel to communicate information. Without a clear communication strategy, new leaders respond reactively to whatever channel screams loudest, creating a perpetual state of context-switching that destroys productivity and cognitive capacity. The Real Price We Pay The communication crisis in tech leadership isn’t just about feeling busy. It has a measurable business impact. Grammarly’s research found that poor communication costs businesses $1.2 trillion annually through lost productivity, elevated turnover, and customer churn. For a single organization, business leaders estimate teams lose 7.47 hours weekly to poor communication, equating to $12,506 per employee yearly. But here’s what hits new leaders hardest: This isn’t about others failing to communicate well. It’s about you learning to communicate strategically as a leader. And nobody taught you how. The consequences compound quickly: Your team becomes disengaged because they’re unclear about priorities and expectations Projects slip because cross-functional alignment fails Top performers leave citing a lack of clarity and direction You burn out trying to be everywhere, for everyone, all the time According to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2024 Report, only one in three employees is engaged at work, and burnout continues to rise. New leaders, trying to prove themselves while learning their role, often push themselves beyond sustainable limits. Two Strategies to Navigate Communication Overload After working with tech leaders across organizations ranging from startups to global enterprises, I’ve identified four core strategies that make the difference between drowning and thriving. #1 Contract and Re-Contract Constantly Most new leaders assume their team knows what’s expected. They don’t. The contract you think you have—about goals, responsibilities, communication norms—exists only in your head. I teach leaders to avoid the toxic questions “Do you have any questions?” and “Is everything clear?” These prompts trigger social pressure to say “yes” even when confusion reigns. Instead, try: “I want to check if I explained this clearly. Can you describe back to me how you understood this?” This simple shift transforms an assumption into confirmation. Do this weekly with your team. When circumstances change (and in tech, they always do), re-contract explicitly rather than making unilateral announcements. #2 Develop Your Communication Intelligence (CQ) Just as you learned technical skills through deliberate practice, you must develop CQ intentionally. This means: Understanding that different people need information delivered in different ways Learning to read behavioral cues that signal misunderstanding or disengagement Recognizing your own communication preferences and consciously stretching beyond them Investing 10-15 seconds at the start of each interaction to observe how the other person communicates, then tailoring your approach Most communication is tailored to ourselves, not to others. We like detailed written documentation, so we send 10-page specs. We prefer face-to-face conversation, so we schedule yet another meeting. Strategic leaders adapt their communication to what works for their audience, not what’s comfortable for them. One CEO I worked with replaced weekly status meetings with short “mission huddles” focused on priorities

Czytaj dalej
Leadership

Do You Want More Visibility as a Leader? Here’s How to Do It.

To have a greater impact as leaders, we need to be more visible. I know that you would prefer the scenario: “Who needs to know, they know” or “Our product is going to speak for itself”, but the truth is that getting people know about what you do is something that’s not just happening. We need to speak up about our ideas, about what we’ve done, what we’ve designed, what we want to change, or what we’ve changed already, because nobody’s going to notice that on their own. Nobody’s going to guess that it is important, to assume that it’s somehow valuable. Harsh, but true. So today I want to focus on what we can do in practice to build more visibility. I’m going to share with you some of my own strategies, so you can just take, copy, and paste them, adding a little bit more flavour to your individual situation. We are going to divide those things into internal and external leadership visibility strategies.     How to Build Visibility Inside the Organization?   If you’re working in the organization: It can be a big organization / a corporate world, or in a smaller organization, but you are inside, what can you do to build your visibility? First, you have your team level. I’m sure that you have some team meetings, knowledge sharing sessions, weekly meetings, retrospectives; depends on the setup that you are working in. These are the places that are already designed for you to share knowledge, experiences, lessons, mistakes, or failures (with lessons learned) that you can show to others. When you speak up, this is always something that makes you more visible. So even if you’re a Base Imaginer, Base Thinker who has the preference to not speak up very much, I would like you to challenge yourself a little bit to be more verbal. I know that you believe that if you work hard in silence, you create valuable solutions to the problems the organization or clients face, the other people will notice you. I don’t want to be a dream-crusher here, but it’s just not going to happen. People are very focused on their own things and don’t have much spare energy to look around. You need to show them. So, I invite you to do one thing like that per week, in a bi-weekly meeting, or once per month. Start small: The goal is for your brain to see that it makes sense and is worth the stretch. Share something that you’ve created, optimised, or automated recently.  Don’t make it complicated, just use what you’re already doing in your work. The second thing you can do is to share knowledge by sending some links to the podcast episodes that were interesting for you to others, a book you’ve read, a YouTube video you watched, or a digital course you’ve taken. I’m sure that you have some Teams / Slack / WhatsApp group in your company where you share some stuff. Leverage that: Share links to YouTube videos, to TED Talks, to podcasts, to books, to articles, to documentation, to Reddit, basically anything that you’re using to get knowledge. Share that with others with a short comment like: Hey! I’m sharing this as something interesting…, It helped me in a way that…, Check it out!”. Easy. You don’t even need to speak up verbally; you just copy and paste a link. But again, it puts you on the map that you share things with others. That way, you can become a go-to person for people who are looking for a certain answer or a source of knowledge. Being a go-to person builds visibility. Start with the team level and then move up. What can you do on the organizational level? Be the voice. The voice of the change or a project. Engage yourself in the project or initiative team, even if there is some extra work to do. You can always make a contract with your boss to be redirected when it comes to your work to a little bit to some project that is maybe like a matrix project in the organization. Maybe this is something different. Maybe this is something that you never done before. Being more visible by creating value is one of the most important things in organizations. The good news? It is not about speaking up all the time. It’s about being visible by being engaged. Of course, you can make some presentations, being a face of the project or initiative, during the Town Hall meeting, some other online or onsite gatherings. Even better! Check out what kind of possibilities there are in your organization that you can leverage. Be a mentor or a buddy for new joiners, or let others shadow you. There are more things you can do than you think. Choose what works for you, start with one thing, and then move to another one if you want.   How to Build Visibility Outside the Organization?   If you are outside of the organization: Maybe you are a consultant / a Fractional CTO / COO, etc.; if you are running your own business: you’re an entrepreneur, a Founder, you can do many things. And if you’re inside the organization, you can use some of those as well (these strategies are not reserved only for “the externals”). First, blogging. You can say that blogging is dead, but it couldn’t be further from the truth. People like to read, especially short forms. Because if you are a visual person, what you read sticks in your brain. So, blogging can be your visibility builder, especially when you take care of the SEO. It can be very well-positioned in Google and in AI tools where people are researching things. It is super easy and low-cost to start. Just start writing down what you know about. Share your expertise, research, pieces of lessons that you have, failures, and success stories. People love reading about those things. The second

Czytaj dalej
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x