Lemanskills.com

How To Organize Work So Nobody Hates You?

During the last 3 years, many of us went through a complete shift of working. We needed to adjust and organize ourselves when the Covid hit, when we could’ve we moved to working from home. The school went home, as well as movie theaters, malls, universities and so on. Our homes became places with multiple functions and we needed to learn how to operate like that without going crazy.

After a while we wanted “normal” so badly that we could’ve done anything to be outside, even a walk around the building became something special. Every trip to the grocery store was an actual event.

And now we are at this place where a lot of us reshaped their lives, changed the way we work, shop, take care of our families and organize free time. We got used to things that before pandemic seemed impossible, like distant learning or working fully remotely. People will adjust to anything when the circumstances push them and that’s what happened to us 3 years back from now.

When we think about working remotely 100%, a lot of research shows that in many cases it doesn’t really matter for whom we click on the computer. We are less attached to the employee and people (especially emotionally), we make faster decisions about the job change. We don’t care that much as long as the conditions are good for us. On the other hand, I remember the times before Covid, when I was in the organization where we built strong connections and even when the times were tough, we did stick together, supporting each other. And many friendships I have from that time are still with me nowadays. Is it even possible without a real human connection and being together in the same room more often to build a value like that?

Should we go hybrid without any specific structure around it? Should we leave people total freedom counting on their good will so they’ll figure that that’s good to be in the office more often? Or should we say to them that we are coming back to the office and they just need to deal with it?

How to organize work environment so nobody hates the firm and don’t quit? Let’s take a look on that.

Hybrid vs remote vs onsite – pros and cons

There are 3 options when we think about organizing work in the company. Each of those has its own pros and cons, taking into consideration two sides of the story: employer and employee. We are going to put both arguments in the same category, so we structure the way of working, not the perspective itself.

What to do when I want to organize work 100% onsite?

Many of us work onsite all the time: Covid or not Covid. Health care, production/industry front line workers, traditional commerce, governmental offices and many more. But when we think about office employees, whose work can be done from home and we want them to work onsite 100% of the time (like mostly was organized before pandemics), we need to take into consideration the main elements. What I gathered is not all of the elements that exist, but my goal here is to show you the broader perspective that can be helpful in making your own decision.

Pros of working 100% onsite:

  • Everyone is at the same place, at the same time – it allows us as a company to fully use office spaces that we have, to organize events, food, training sessions, meetings or conferences onsite
  • No one is excluded from what’s happening in the office (because they work remotely)
  • No troubles with bad internet connection, being distracted by notifications, stimulus from home environment
  • Quick gathering information from the people that sit next to us, no need to wait until somebody replies to an e-mail or Teams message
  • The relations are build every day, during office gatherings, meetings or eating together
  • It’s easier to onboard a new employee (especially when there is a specific technology, equipment in the office), to show them everything onsite
  • Manager can react faster when something is wrong within the team (the signals are there all the time)

Cons of working 100% onsite:

  • Limited talent pool (recruiting only in the area/city where the office is located)
  • High office costs (rent, media, food, maintenance services, commute – if we have it as a benefit for employees etc.)
  • Noise, being distracted by the other people walking around, asking questions or asking for advice
  • Commute time
  • Not comfortable all-size-fits-all office spaces (desks, chairs etc.)

What to do when I want to organize work 100% remote?

During covid, most of the people whose work was possible to do remotely, went home – effective immediately. It was the safest approach, which aim was to stop virus from spreading with keeping business continuity going. For many it was extremely hard at the beginning, especially when they had small apartments and/or kids with a school at home. Many didn’t have proper desk or chair – I literally know about the cases when someone needed to put the ironing board in the toilet and that was their place to have Teams calls.

But, as mentioned before, after a while a person get used to anything when they need to. We organized our “office space” at home as well as possible, we created the rest of our lives somehow around the work and keep going. The impossible before the pandemic became possible, even comfortable for some of us.

Pros of working 100% remote:

  • No need to keep the office (cutting fixed costs – sometimes a huge amount of money)
  • Reduce other office-related costs (rent, media, food, maintenance services etc.)
  • Everyone is remote so it’s easier to organize meetings: always 100% remotely (no inequalities)
  • We have an access to the whole global talent pool
  • Employees save commute time that they can invest in their hobbies, spending time with their families or friends etc.
  • It’s more eco-friendly: we don’t use transportation = we save energy and fuel

Cons of working 100% remote:

  • There is a risk of no loyalty/low engagement (there is no difference for which organization
    “I click on the computer”)
  • Relations “don’t make themselves on their own” – we need to organize the time and space to build them
  • When we use the global talent pool and the team becomes more and more diverse, there are cultural differences that may be a big challenge for managers to deal with on a daily basis
  • It can take a long time to get an answer for a Teams message or an e-mail (when a person is not responsive – I cannot just approach the person and ask a question)
  • Resistance of turning on the cameras can decrease the engagement in the meetings/workshops as well as in effective management (I don’t see the reactions or emotions of people so I cannot address the situation properly) which can lead to more conflicts, misunderstanding in communication etc.
  • The trust is harder to build since we don’t have deeper relationship (no trust = no engagement)
  • If we have troubles with setting boundaries, we can never leave work – the lines can be blurred and our work-life balance can be disrupted
  • Isolation (not being around other people, even just physically in the same space) in a longer period of time can lead to depression or other mental health disorders – it’s especially connected to the people who live alone (even when they say they don’t need anyone and they’re perfectly fine on their own)
  • Inequalities in internet connection (some cities/regions have very poor infrastructure so they can’t be on cameras or they lose connection, it crashes all the time) can influence the comfort of work: especially during the calls

What to do when I want to organize hybrid work?

One of the most difficult post-Covid for companies who have office workers is: should we come back to the office? Even when we can see that work can be done well at home, don’t we miss being together at the office? Shouldn’t we try to recreate the relations, atmosphere, shared meals and coffee? But what if our employees will resist and say that they don’t want to do it anymore?

Hybrid work can be done in few different ways, in this article I’ll cover the situation when employer decides that employees should be at the office certain number of days per week/month (let’s say that it’s 2 days in the office, 3 days remote).

Pros of working hybrid:

  • Building relationships within and between the teams in the office space
  • Gathering information faster with cooperation onsite with others
  • Flexibility in organizing remote and onsite days for employees and managers
  • Possibility to learn how to be more adaptive in planning work (i.e. at home I do individual, focus-needed tasks and at the office I take part in meetings, trainings, workshops, brainstorming sessions, shared meals etc.) which can increase efficiency and effectiveness of work
  • Diversity of environment (onsite and online) can bring stimuli and reduce the risk of burnout or low engagement
  • Changing landscape, being among people can protect us from mental health issues (i.e. connected to the isolation while working fully remotely)
  • Office equipment to use (office space, desks, IT tools, printers, good coffee, better light – i.e. when I can’t afford it or don’t have this quality at home)

Cons of working hybrid:

  • It’s hard to reorganize life one more time (we did it when the Covid hit, now we need to do it once again)
  • Some of us moved to the countryside, to another city (or country), so it’s hard to be in the office certain amount of time per week/month
  • If the days onsite/remote are not repetitive (roughly the same each week), it can be hard to stick to the same structure (i.e. when you have kids and they need to be in certain places at a certain time)
  • When team members are not on site/remote at the same time, there is no equality (or even possibility) in meetings or workshops (hybrid version doesn’t work at all in my experience in educational practices)
  • It can be harder for some people to switch more frequently between the work environment (organized at home and in the office)

As we can see, each option has its pros and cons. And it’s almost equal numbers of arguments in each section, so it makes the decision about what to choose even harder. So how to choose wisely?  

How to organize work in the constant change?

Many of us experienced multiple changes in the last couple of years.

Globalization of the business, tech boom, wars all over the world, inflation, bad economy.

Covid, waiting for a vaccine so we can “go back to normal” (even when we don’t even know what “normal” means anymore), doing everything at home, isolation, saying “hi” with touching the elbows.

In the organizations we needed to move a lot of work to fully remote mode, sending employees home, often without proper preparation. Managers needed to change the way they manage teams, for many of them if was the first time when they didn’t see their employees in the office space on a daily basis. We needed to adjust our tech solutions, processes, policies and everything that was necessary to keep the business going.

Taking all of that into account, adding the trials of 4-day work week in some countries, the new discoveries of people (many discovered over the pandemic that they don’t want to be in the rat’s corporate race anymore), labor law changes (i.e. in Poland a huge one coming in April), organizations need to rethink how they want to shape their cultures. The question is: how to organize work in the constant change, when we never know what will hit and when? And how to organize it so people live their lives, align work with life, health with growth, family with friends? It’s all one big ecosystem: maybe now it’s even more visible than ever. Is it even a matter of remote/onsite/hybrid choice? Or maybe it’s more employee/human/client or money centric choice?

What decision is the best decision?

I’m an advocate of smart choice and autonomy. Each organization and their culture is different, every business needs something else to work in the best possible way. There is no one-size-fits-all solution that I can give you so the magic starts happening.

If I was in the position of choice, I would go with the smart hybrid solutions, with team meetings, workshops, company conferences and brainstorming sessions onsite, combined with a focused, undisturbed individual time for deep work at home. I believe that that kind of combination will allow us all to feel that we are a part of a great organization and we also have a space and flexibility to manage our lives so we live if fully.

When choosing, think about the holistic approach to the business and life, adaptability and good leadership which allows to make good, smart decisions with having a bigger picture in our heads. Think about different angles of the story: we need to keep business running as well as we want to have a healthy culture with engaged and satisfied employees. And every single employee has their own agenda, needs, personal preferences.

The key is to make it all work so it’s a pleasure to cooperate and just be together.

Shouldn’t it be the ultimate goal for most of us?

Udostępnij

Komentarze

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 komentarzy
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Czytaj także

Organization

Job-Hugging: When Staying Put Becomes a Strategy (Or a Trap)

Remember 2021? When did it feel like everyone and their neighbor was quitting their job? The Great Resignation dominated headlines—millions of people walking away from their roles every single month. Media outlets couldn’t stop talking about it. Fast forward to today, and the pendulum has swung hard in the opposite direction. Welcome to the era of job-hugging. What the Numbers Are Telling Us? According to Monster’s 2025 Job Hugging Report, the landscape has completely shifted. Here’s what’s happening: 48% of workers admit they’re staying in their current roles longer than they otherwise would—driven by comfort, security, and stability 75% plan to remain in their current position for at least the next two years 85% say they’ve practiced job-hugging at some point in their career Voluntary departures have dropped from 4.5 million monthly (November 2021 peak) to around 3.2-3.3 million today The trend isn’t slowing down. 59% of workers say job-hugging is more common in 2025 than it was last year, and 63% expect it to grow even stronger in 2026. The top reasons people are staying put? Compensation and benefits (27%) and job security (26%). This isn’t just data. This is a fundamental shift in how people think about their careers. When Job-Hugging Makes Sense? Let me be clear about something: job-hugging isn’t inherently good or bad. It’s a tool. And like any tool, context matters. Sometimes staying is the smartest decision you can make. Maybe you have a mortgage. Maybe your partner just switched jobs, and you need the stability. Maybe you’re dealing with health issues—yours or a family member’s. Maybe you’re simply exhausted from the mental load of the past few years and don’t have the bandwidth for a job search right now. All of these are valid reasons. Job searching is work. It’s additional, unpaid work on top of your already full plate. Not everyone has the energy for that, and that’s okay. But here’s where it gets interesting: job-hugging can actually work in your favor if you’re intentional about it. Staying in your current role makes sense when you’re: Taking on new projects that stretch your capabilities Learning from people outside your immediate team Building deep expertise that compounds over time Developing relationships that open doors internally Getting exposure to different parts of the business The keyword here? Intentional. Because staying by default and staying by design are two completely different strategies. The Trap Nobody Talks About Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many teams right now are full of people who’ve mentally checked out but physically stayed. That’s not stability. That’s inertia masquerading as strategy. The Monster report revealed some telling emotional trade-offs: 38% say job-hugging has no real impact on their satisfaction 27% feel less satisfied and “stuck” in their roles 25% feel more satisfied, citing security and value When it comes to career growth, workers are similarly divided: 47% say it has little effect 27% see it as limiting advancement 26% believe it builds expertise And here’s what concerns me most: 94% of workers recognize there are risks to job-hugging. The top concerns? Missing out on higher pay (26%), burnout from lack of change (25%), and limited career advancement (25%). So people know. They know they’re potentially trading long-term growth for short-term comfort. But they’re doing it anyway. The Real Question Leaders Should Be Asking If 75% of your team plans to stay through 2027, what are you doing to ensure they’re growing, not just showing up? This is where most organizations are failing spectacularly. See, employers love job huggers. The same Monster report shows that companies value them for loyalty (26%), institutional knowledge (22%), and lower turnover costs (30%). But here’s the problem: just because someone is staying doesn’t mean they’re engaged. It doesn’t mean they’re motivated. And it definitely doesn’t mean they’re performing at their best. In my work with tech leaders through the CQ Leadership Method, I see this pattern constantly: Teams filled with talented people who are… fine. Not thriving. Not building. Not pushing boundaries. Just… there. They show up to meetings. They complete their tasks. They don’t rock the boat. But they’re not bringing the energy, creativity, or commitment that actually moves organizations forward. And leaders? They’re often relieved people aren’t quitting, so they don’t dig deeper. What Communication Intelligence Reveals About Job-Hugging? When I work with teams using Process Communication Model® (PCM), one of the first things we uncover is how people’s motivational needs are—or aren’t—being met. People don’t just stay in jobs for money and benefits, despite what they tell surveys. They stay (or leave) based on whether their core psychological needs are being fulfilled. For some people, job-hugging might feel safe because their need for structure and recognition is being met. For others, it’s a quiet desperation—they need challenge, growth, and autonomy, but fear has them frozen in place. The difference between strategic job-hugging and career stagnation often comes down to this: Are you having real conversations about what people actually need to grow? Not surface-level check-ins. Not performance reviews that feel like box-ticking exercises. Real conversations. The kind where you ask: “What do you want to learn this year that you don’t know how to do right now?” “What projects would energize you?” “What’s one thing that, if we could change it, would make you more excited to be here?” These conversations require Communication Intelligence (CQ)—the ability to recognize that different people are motivated by different things, and to tailor your leadership approach accordingly. What Actually Works: Moving From Job-Hugging to Strategic Growth If you’re a leader right now, here’s what I’d encourage you to do: Acknowledge the reality Don’t pretend the economic uncertainty isn’t real. Don’t downplay people’s legitimate concerns about stability. Meet them where they are. Create visible growth paths If people are going to stay for two years, show them what growth looks like internally. Not vague “development opportunities”—specific projects, skills, and experiences they can pursue. Make development a performance metric Track it. Talk about it in 1:1s. Make it as important

Czytaj dalej
Leadership

The Number One Struggle of New Tech Leaders (And How to Navigate It)

You’ve just been promoted. The title changed from Senior Developer to Engineering Manager, from Tech Lead to Director of Technology. Congratulations—you’ve worked hard for this moment.   But then reality hits. Your inbox explodes. Slack messages pile up faster than you can read them. You’re pulled into meeting after meeting. Your calendar looks like a game of Tetris gone wrong. And that code you used to write? That deep work you loved? It’s now squeezed into whatever gaps remain between 1:1s, stand-ups, stakeholder updates, and strategic planning sessions. Welcome to the number one struggle every brand-new leader in technology faces: Communication overload. The Hidden Cost of Being “Always On” Here’s what nobody tells you when you step into leadership: Your job has fundamentally transformed from creating solutions to constant communication. And the data confirms this shift is real—and overwhelming. According to Grammarly’s 2024 State of Business Communication Report, developed with The Harris Poll, knowledge workers now spend 88% of their workweek communicating. For new tech leaders juggling team management, cross-functional collaboration, and strategic initiatives, that percentage often exceeds 100% of a standard work week. The report reveals something even more alarming: in the past 12 months, 78% of professionals saw increases in communication frequency, while 73% are using more communication channels than ever before. For HR teams and large organizations—exactly where many new tech leaders find themselves—many report spending over 40 hours weekly on communication alone. Think about that for a moment. Communication isn’t just part of the job anymore. Communication is the job. Why New Tech Leaders Feel it Most Intensely? As someone who works with hundreds of tech leaders each year through workshops and one-on-one mentoring, I see this pattern repeatedly. New leaders get caught in what I call the “triple communication trap”: You haven’t let go of your Individual Contributor identity. You were promoted because you were exceptional at solving technical problems. Your brain is wired to think in code, systems, and architecture. But now, your value comes from enabling others to do that work. This identity shift is brutal, and most new leaders try to do both—leading AND coding—which doubles their communication load while halving their effectiveness at each. You lack Communication Intelligence (CQ). We invest heavily in developing technical skills—learning new frameworks, mastering cloud architectures, and understanding AI/ML pipelines. But communication? We assume it’s intuitive. It’s not. Just as you wouldn’t expect someone to write production-ready code without training, you can’t expect leaders to navigate complex human dynamics without developing their Communication Intelligence. As I explored in the article on Communication Debt, many organizations suffer from a severe lack of investment in communication processes. New leaders inherit this debt without realizing it, then struggle to understand why their teams seem disengaged or why projects constantly fail due to “miscommunication.” You’re drowning in channels without a strategy. Email. Slack. Teams. Zoom. Jira. Confluence. GitHub comments. The average tech leader toggles between 8-10 communication platforms daily. Research shows that 55% of professionals say the constant flow of notifications across channels makes it hard to concentrate on important tasks, and 47% feel unsure about selecting the right channel to communicate information. Without a clear communication strategy, new leaders respond reactively to whatever channel screams loudest, creating a perpetual state of context-switching that destroys productivity and cognitive capacity. The Real Price We Pay The communication crisis in tech leadership isn’t just about feeling busy. It has a measurable business impact. Grammarly’s research found that poor communication costs businesses $1.2 trillion annually through lost productivity, elevated turnover, and customer churn. For a single organization, business leaders estimate teams lose 7.47 hours weekly to poor communication, equating to $12,506 per employee yearly. But here’s what hits new leaders hardest: This isn’t about others failing to communicate well. It’s about you learning to communicate strategically as a leader. And nobody taught you how. The consequences compound quickly: Your team becomes disengaged because they’re unclear about priorities and expectations Projects slip because cross-functional alignment fails Top performers leave citing a lack of clarity and direction You burn out trying to be everywhere, for everyone, all the time According to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2024 Report, only one in three employees is engaged at work, and burnout continues to rise. New leaders, trying to prove themselves while learning their role, often push themselves beyond sustainable limits. Two Strategies to Navigate Communication Overload After working with tech leaders across organizations ranging from startups to global enterprises, I’ve identified four core strategies that make the difference between drowning and thriving. #1 Contract and Re-Contract Constantly Most new leaders assume their team knows what’s expected. They don’t. The contract you think you have—about goals, responsibilities, communication norms—exists only in your head. I teach leaders to avoid the toxic questions “Do you have any questions?” and “Is everything clear?” These prompts trigger social pressure to say “yes” even when confusion reigns. Instead, try: “I want to check if I explained this clearly. Can you describe back to me how you understood this?” This simple shift transforms an assumption into confirmation. Do this weekly with your team. When circumstances change (and in tech, they always do), re-contract explicitly rather than making unilateral announcements. #2 Develop Your Communication Intelligence (CQ) Just as you learned technical skills through deliberate practice, you must develop CQ intentionally. This means: Understanding that different people need information delivered in different ways Learning to read behavioral cues that signal misunderstanding or disengagement Recognizing your own communication preferences and consciously stretching beyond them Investing 10-15 seconds at the start of each interaction to observe how the other person communicates, then tailoring your approach Most communication is tailored to ourselves, not to others. We like detailed written documentation, so we send 10-page specs. We prefer face-to-face conversation, so we schedule yet another meeting. Strategic leaders adapt their communication to what works for their audience, not what’s comfortable for them. One CEO I worked with replaced weekly status meetings with short “mission huddles” focused on priorities

Czytaj dalej
Leadership

Do You Want More Visibility as a Leader? Here’s How to Do It.

To have a greater impact as leaders, we need to be more visible. I know that you would prefer the scenario: “Who needs to know, they know” or “Our product is going to speak for itself”, but the truth is that getting people know about what you do is something that’s not just happening. We need to speak up about our ideas, about what we’ve done, what we’ve designed, what we want to change, or what we’ve changed already, because nobody’s going to notice that on their own. Nobody’s going to guess that it is important, to assume that it’s somehow valuable. Harsh, but true. So today I want to focus on what we can do in practice to build more visibility. I’m going to share with you some of my own strategies, so you can just take, copy, and paste them, adding a little bit more flavour to your individual situation. We are going to divide those things into internal and external leadership visibility strategies.     How to Build Visibility Inside the Organization?   If you’re working in the organization: It can be a big organization / a corporate world, or in a smaller organization, but you are inside, what can you do to build your visibility? First, you have your team level. I’m sure that you have some team meetings, knowledge sharing sessions, weekly meetings, retrospectives; depends on the setup that you are working in. These are the places that are already designed for you to share knowledge, experiences, lessons, mistakes, or failures (with lessons learned) that you can show to others. When you speak up, this is always something that makes you more visible. So even if you’re a Base Imaginer, Base Thinker who has the preference to not speak up very much, I would like you to challenge yourself a little bit to be more verbal. I know that you believe that if you work hard in silence, you create valuable solutions to the problems the organization or clients face, the other people will notice you. I don’t want to be a dream-crusher here, but it’s just not going to happen. People are very focused on their own things and don’t have much spare energy to look around. You need to show them. So, I invite you to do one thing like that per week, in a bi-weekly meeting, or once per month. Start small: The goal is for your brain to see that it makes sense and is worth the stretch. Share something that you’ve created, optimised, or automated recently.  Don’t make it complicated, just use what you’re already doing in your work. The second thing you can do is to share knowledge by sending some links to the podcast episodes that were interesting for you to others, a book you’ve read, a YouTube video you watched, or a digital course you’ve taken. I’m sure that you have some Teams / Slack / WhatsApp group in your company where you share some stuff. Leverage that: Share links to YouTube videos, to TED Talks, to podcasts, to books, to articles, to documentation, to Reddit, basically anything that you’re using to get knowledge. Share that with others with a short comment like: Hey! I’m sharing this as something interesting…, It helped me in a way that…, Check it out!”. Easy. You don’t even need to speak up verbally; you just copy and paste a link. But again, it puts you on the map that you share things with others. That way, you can become a go-to person for people who are looking for a certain answer or a source of knowledge. Being a go-to person builds visibility. Start with the team level and then move up. What can you do on the organizational level? Be the voice. The voice of the change or a project. Engage yourself in the project or initiative team, even if there is some extra work to do. You can always make a contract with your boss to be redirected when it comes to your work to a little bit to some project that is maybe like a matrix project in the organization. Maybe this is something different. Maybe this is something that you never done before. Being more visible by creating value is one of the most important things in organizations. The good news? It is not about speaking up all the time. It’s about being visible by being engaged. Of course, you can make some presentations, being a face of the project or initiative, during the Town Hall meeting, some other online or onsite gatherings. Even better! Check out what kind of possibilities there are in your organization that you can leverage. Be a mentor or a buddy for new joiners, or let others shadow you. There are more things you can do than you think. Choose what works for you, start with one thing, and then move to another one if you want.   How to Build Visibility Outside the Organization?   If you are outside of the organization: Maybe you are a consultant / a Fractional CTO / COO, etc.; if you are running your own business: you’re an entrepreneur, a Founder, you can do many things. And if you’re inside the organization, you can use some of those as well (these strategies are not reserved only for “the externals”). First, blogging. You can say that blogging is dead, but it couldn’t be further from the truth. People like to read, especially short forms. Because if you are a visual person, what you read sticks in your brain. So, blogging can be your visibility builder, especially when you take care of the SEO. It can be very well-positioned in Google and in AI tools where people are researching things. It is super easy and low-cost to start. Just start writing down what you know about. Share your expertise, research, pieces of lessons that you have, failures, and success stories. People love reading about those things. The second

Czytaj dalej
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x